Posted 3 months ago

Well it’s official…

adelein:

freeplanetickettonorthkorea:

adelein:

freeplanetickettonorthkorea:

The world is ending… G4 is going bye bye… They will be rebranded as the Esquire channel…
WHERE THE HELL ARE GAMERS GOING TO GO NOW FOR THEIR GAMING TV? AND ALL TECH NEWS! They canceled attack of the show, and Xplay…
This really sucks… 

FUCK MY LIFE!

…but but… Olivia Munn

Where the hell have you been? She’s been gone for more than 2 years!

I know thats when I stopped watching, I really have not payed attention since then.


i stopped watching once G4 replaced TechTV. I miss Leo and Patrick on The Screen Savers. I do know Patrick is over at Revision3.com running his own channel there called Tekzilla, great show.  and when i need gaming news, i go to GiantBomb.com

Posted 6 months ago

I'M RAD.: the monetary value of art

eskiworks:

fwugradiation:

ipgd:

fwugradiation:

The value of art is a function of:

1. What people are willing to pay for the art.
2. The cost for which you are willing to create the art.

It doesn’t matter if someone thinks $25 is too much for a colored sketch, if more people are willing to pay than you can handle, you should definitely…

i think there’s something of a distinction between “undervaluing your art” and “undervaluing your labor”

no matter how crappy you are, you are still expending time and the absolute base value of that time is minimum wage. with “real” jobs, if the quality of your labor is too poor to be worth minimum wage, your pay isnt reduced below minimum wage, you get fired

if the quality of your art is so poor that it is IMPOSSIBLE to reach minimum wage for your labor, it is time for you to fire yourself from paid work until you are good enough to make it

when you’re getting down to the matter of art that is so bad that no one is even WILLING to pay a fair labor wage for the produced, it seems like something that’d be pointless to quibble about, but low cost art of anything but the most laughably poor art imaginable does still impact the market in a non-negligible capacity

every price that is set in a public space impacts the expectations of the market. and in the market of art, where quality is much harder to pin down than the quality of, say, the construction of a chair, those prices affect not only those lateral to you in skill but those above as well

a lot of the people who are going to be buying your art are going to be non-artists or far below you in skill level, with poor ability to actually assess the relative value of artwork. for the uninitiated there’s a bar of quality that is typically set fairly low beyond which the comparitive values of art blur together. people who are not trained in art can distinguish between huge disparities in ability (we all know da vinci is better than chris chan, but can someone who’s never trained in art look between da vinci and michelangelo and be able to point out not just whos art they like more, but which one is more technically proficient?) but in the context of online freelance those outliers are typically absent, so you have a huge pool of workers who are within that range of skill where the untrained cannot accurately contrast price value individually within that group and so applies that same expected standard for pricing to groups that are NOT lateral in skill or who produce art that involves substantially more or less labor than others

people will look at it as “art”, ignorant to the individual value of your commodity, and judge it as overpriced because they a) have no concept of the degree of time an work that goes into a piece of art, and b) cannot meaningfully distinguish the art of a moderately skilled person from a 14 year old girl on deviantart who is just barely above the threshold of “impressive to someone who’s never drawn”

you obviously can’t single handedly change the expectations of the market but setting prices that low does affect the ability of people who are actually pursuing art as a professional career to be paid fairly (and also affects the expectations of artists SETTING their prices which sends a ripple up the chain of artists who COULD charge much more than they do but don’t know they can, which in turn reflects back onto the expectations of buyers, etc.) the prices you set your art at affects everybody and undercutting yourself hard as a hobbyist impacts people who are trying to work through art as an actual means of living, even if the exact price you get paid isnt meaningful to YOU

Wow my power is out and my phone is gonna die, i dont remember if this bloated rambling shitpost even had a point but im not gonna bother to proofread it bye

very good post and agreed, after I made the post and went to class I was like “also setting prices higher does raise the expectations of peoples cost and therefore make people willing to spend more??? prices aren’t made in a vaccuum??” I always have the tendency to oversimplify things haha

There have been some discussions in my blog about art pricing, and how lower prices effect the market, what what a person’s time is worth etc. What’s said here reiterates a lot of what I’ve said, but with brand new shiny word combinations that I like! A good read, thanks you guys!

Thanks!
nice read

Posted 6 months ago

liberalbutnotpartisan:

Leadership: President Obama is doing it right.

(Source: thewarroomctv)

Posted 6 months ago

stephen-ghoulberts-spooky-time:

sweetlittlekitty:

pudding-is-the-new-fondue:

lokis-army-at-221b:

leviosa:

jacknoir-sexual:

Doctor Who according to me.

This is perfect.

Sassy bitch and I think he was the doctor’s boyfriend at some point

British Slenderman

DOCTOR’S BOYFRIEND

you missed one thing

they’re all sassy bitches

British Slendermen XD

Posted 6 months ago

SO CUTE

Posted 6 months ago
liberalsarecool:

Via Teabonics

XD This one made me laugh.

liberalsarecool:

Via Teabonics

XD This one made me laugh.

Posted 7 months ago
We had our first debate last night. And when I got onto the stage, I met this very spirited fellow who claimed to be Mitt Romney. But it couldn’t have been Mitt Romney—because the real Mitt Romney has been running around the country for the last year promising $5 trillion in tax cuts that favor the wealthy. The fellow on stage last night said he didn’t know anything about that.

The real Mitt Romney said we don’t need any more teachers in our classrooms. But the fellow on stage last night, he loves teachers—can’t get enough of them. The Mitt Romney we all know invested in companies that were called “pioneers” of outsourcing jobs to other countries. But the guy on stage last night, he said that he doesn’t even know that there are such laws that encourage outsourcing—he’s never heard of them. Never heard of them. Never heard of tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas. He said that if it’s true, he must need a new accountant.

Now, we know for sure it was not the real Mitt Romney, because he seems to be doing just fine with his current accountant. So you see, the man on stage last night, he does not want to be held accountable for the real Mitt Romney’s decisions and what he’s been saying for the last year. And that’s because he knows full well that we don’t want what he’s been selling for the last year. So Governor Romney may dance around his positions, but if you want to be President, you owe the American people the truth.
President Obama in Denver, CO today (via barackobama)
Posted 7 months ago

Here are the 27 myths Romney told in 38 minutes

abaldwin360:

I was really disappointed that the president didn’t call Romney out on his bullshit.

I’ve always thought that President Obama was an excellent political strategist, and I’m trying to figure out if he was just off his game last night or if he’s playing some kind of rope-a-dope so he can call out an over-confident Romney in a later debate.

Tell me about it.

Romney looked as good as someone can look when avoiding the truth.

Obama had ample opportunity to call him out; i’m baffled as to why he didn’t

(Source: think-progress)

Posted 7 months ago

galgidrasil:

Ain’t even gonna lie, had the biggest crush on Draco as a kid. :[ I HAD CRUSHES ON EVERYTHING AS A KID, I was dumb.

I need to watch this movie again, damn. <3

EEE!

Loved this movie as a kid.

Seeing these gifs like this really gives me a chance to see how awesome Draco’s mannerisms are in this exchange.

Love the first one “Oh Please” [sigh]

(Source: roominthecastle)

Posted 8 months ago

kiwibutt:

teppelin:

jesus christ I seriously can’t watch Lion King anymore because Nala is giving Simba bedroom eyes and then it clicks that they’re making their sequel baby

SIMBA PUT YOUR LION DICK IN ME, WE NEED TO FRANCHISE THIS SHIT

HURRY UP AND HAKUNA MY TATAS

Be Prepared!